Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site stat-l
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Stat-L:rsk
From: rsk@stat-l (Rich Kulawiec (Vombatus Hirsutus))
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Christianity and its Relationship to... specifically Judaism
Message-ID: <171@stat-l>
Date: Fri, 2-Nov-84 02:24:47 EST
Article-I.D.: stat-l.171
Posted: Fri Nov  2 02:24:47 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 3-Nov-84 03:21:18 EST
References: <1628@ucf-cs.UUCP>
Organization: Purdue, THE Indiana University
Lines: 20

> From: yiri@ucf-cs.UUCP (Yirmiyahu BenDavid)
> Newsgroups: net.religion
> Subject: Christianity and its Relationship to... specifically Judaism
> 
> While there is controversy around the net among Christians regarding any
> given Christian's knowledge of Christianity, there should be no question
> that the Christian does not know Judaism and is, therefore, unqualified
> to make such statements about it. Christians should not pretend
> to speak for Judaism. That is for Jews, and Jews only, to do.

	Why, then, do *you* proceed to make comments about Christianity? 

	It's a short extrapolation from your argument to "Anthropologists
should not comment on Masai society; that's for the Masai to do", a similarly
ridiculous statement.
-- 
---Rsk

UUCP: { decvax, icalqa, ihnp4, inuxc, sequent, uiucdcs  } !pur-ee!rsk
      { decwrl, hplabs, icase, psuvax1, siemens, ucbvax } !purdue!rsk