Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!ihuxf!features
From: features@ihuxf.UUCP (M.A. Zeszutko)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Inclusive Language
Message-ID: <2466@ihuxf.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 6-Nov-84 14:05:14 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxf.2466
Posted: Tue Nov  6 14:05:14 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 8-Nov-84 00:16:34 EST
References: <239@qantel.UUCP> <1094@ihuxm.UUCP> <243@qantel.UUCP> <1453@qubix.UUCP> <212@pyuxd.UUCP> <863@ihuxn.Re: Inclusive Language
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 12

From Ken Nichols:
> I use 'men' as a collective term for the human race, just as the Bible does.
> It's much easier than typing,
> All members-of-the-human-race are guilty before God.....
> 
> Isn't this a little extremist anyway?

How extremist is it to ask people to use "mankind" or "people"?  It says
the same thing, and is less divisive. Extremist indeed!

aMAZon
ihnp4!ihuxf!features