Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site qantel.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!qantel!ken From: ken@qantel.UUCP (Ken Nichols@ex6193) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Two pea brains in a pod! Message-ID: <304@qantel.UUCP> Date: Thu, 8-Nov-84 14:38:33 EST Article-I.D.: qantel.304 Posted: Thu Nov 8 14:38:33 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 10-Nov-84 09:04:26 EST References: <> <1846@nsc.UUCP> Organization: MDS Qantel, Hayward, CA Lines: 37 Chug writes, > In article <4131@decwrl.UUCP> arndt@lymph.DEC writes: > >>What a load of silly crap you guys are spooning out. And you have the BALLS >>to knock the Christians!!! You make them look pretty reasonable. No wonder >>they want to have a net free of your barf. > Ah, if you can't baffle them with brilliance, bury them with, well, > nevermind. I never knocked the Christians or their faith. I knocked their > lack of willingness to allow me to practice my faith in the same way I > allow them to practice theirs-- with my tolerance that NEITHER path is > incorrect, just different. > > Ken, I firmly believe you were born into the wrong century. You belong in > 1600 Salem where you could torture people like me by calling them > 'witches', during the inquisitions where you could stick red hot pokers > into my eyes, during the great holy wars where you could have gone and > killed heathens for their lack of faith, raped their women, and slaughtered > their children. the world is too civilised for people like you-- your lack > of caring for your fellow man disgusts me. I try to be tolerant of other > people's viewpoints, but I have my limits. I firmly believe that if your > Jesus was half the man my studies of him show him to be (son of God or not) > he would spit on you for your flagrant disregard of his teachings; all the > time professing to be a follower of his. It is the people like you that > give the REAL Christians such a bad name. > > chuq (I love my fellow man, but does Ken Qualify?) > -- I think Chug thinks that I, Ken Nichols, wrote the above flame about Chug when in fact it was Ken Arndt. Although I don't believe in your religuous system, I wouldn't make such a personal attack on you. Ken Arndt is an athiest or agnostic or one of those. He is not a Christian. Please don't confuse us. -- Ken Nichols -----------