Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!umcp-cs!mangoe From: mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Science as Religion (other objections to Wingate's article) Message-ID: <975@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Sat, 10-Nov-84 21:06:10 EST Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.975 Posted: Sat Nov 10 21:06:10 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 11-Nov-84 22:08:49 EST References: <704@umcp-cs.UUCP> <209@cybvax0.UUCP> <770@umcp-cs.UUCP> <221@cybvax0.UUCP> Reply-To: mangoe@maryland.UUCP (Charley Wingate) Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 26 Occam's Razor only works because in science, we are not concerned with Truth; we are concerned with the "best" possible explanation. "Best" in this context means the explanation which has the most predictive power. It is important to note that, ignoring Occam's razor for the moment, two theories which predict exactly the same results are equivalent, regradless of their inner mechanics. Occam's Razor simply allows us two anoint one theory as "the" theory on the basis of a) simplicity and b) minimal unobservable attributes. It is irrelevant to science that the actual working of the universe may be according to the complicated theory with lots of unobservable attributes. Now God is a extreme example of a largely unobservable attribute which complicates any theory immensely, without really increasing its predictive power. Scientists therefore are reluctant to appeal to deities in their theories. The resurrection, as it is recorded, isn't remotely what any respectable scientist would consider as reliable experimental data. It is a one-time event, observed by perhaps a few hundred not especially unbiased observers. On the other hand, it is an absolutely one-time event, as claimed. Its alleged improbability is not relevant to whether or not it had in fact occured; if it did happen, of course it would have appeared very unlikely. The fact that something happens rarely (or especially only once) is not necessarily an argument that it doesn't happen at all. Charley Wingate umcp-cs!mangoe