Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-athena.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!mit-athena!martillo From: martillo@mit-athena.ARPA (Joaquim Martillo) Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish Subject: Re: BenDavid on Polygamy in Judaism Message-ID: <56@mit-athena.ARPA> Date: Mon, 29-Oct-84 10:32:05 EST Article-I.D.: mit-athe.56 Posted: Mon Oct 29 10:32:05 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 31-Oct-84 06:34:39 EST References: <1045@akgua.UUCP>, <274@edsel.UUCP> Organization: MIT, Project Athena, Cambridge, Ma. Lines: 32 >Jews of European origin (e.g. Ashkenazim) follow a post-talmudic decision >know as the Takana of Rabenu Gershom which forbade polygamy for the next >1000 years. This decision was never accepted among Sefardim and technically >has expired although it is now followed because it is accepted custom. I have in the past tried to find info about this tikun and the gathering of Ashkenazi rabbis which accepted it. I have been unsuccessful in finding contemporary evidence. The story has all the characteristics of a myth used to justify accepting an incorrect practise. Example: we know very little about Gershom and have very few of his writings but he is reputed to be very great and to have extablished the system of study in France. This is just the sort of person to attribute basis for such a practise. Anyone know some hard and fast evidence. >My understanding has alway been that Rabenu Gershom >(light of the exile) promolgated this decision because >he decided it was a necessary condition for the continued existence >of Jews in Christian countries. Worthwhile to remember that if there was such a tikun approximately 98% of the Jewish people rejected it at the time it was made. And it was only accepted by the rabbis of the intellectual backwaters of the Jewish world. >There are several examples of accepted polygamy in Tanakh (Torah, Prophets, >Writings) including some that drew negative rabbinic comment. The extant >prohibitions include marrying two sisters and favoring the son (as far >as the birthright) of the more-beloved wife.