Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!wjh12!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!robert
From: robert@brl-tgr.ARPA (Robert Shnidman )
Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish
Subject: Re: Torah min ha-shamayim
Message-ID: <5539@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 1-Nov-84 08:13:05 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.5539
Posted: Thu Nov  1 08:13:05 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 3-Nov-84 21:51:42 EST
References: <1616@ucf-cs.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 9

I'm preparing an answer to your request for me to elaborate on my previous
listing, but am quite busy so it will take a bit. However I consider a
scholarly discussion to include references and sources for statements. I
attach little or no value to statements of historical "facts" unless they
are backed up. I am specifically refering to your inferences of the history
of the Oral Law.

			Robert Shnidman
			robert@brl-vld.arpa