Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-kirk!williams
From: williams@kirk.DEC (John Williams 223-3402)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Procedural Analysis Technique
Message-ID: <4157@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 7-Nov-84 13:09:35 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.4157
Posted: Wed Nov  7 13:09:35 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 8-Nov-84 07:49:19 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 44



	Alright. It appears as though some of my articles have 
been confusing to you fellow netters. I will make this one as 
straight forward and concise as possible. This article will be 
organized in such a manner as to avoid misinterpretation. I will 
not use any form of inappropriate protocol to express any of my 
ideas within this submittal. A clear concept will be developed. I 
will avoid redundancy to make it reasonably brief, yet repeat 
some of the key topics in order to bring them even more to your 
attention. I will also give the honesty that this type of letter 
requires. In such a delicate matter, I will take the time to 
develop these thoughts in a coherent manner.

	This is how I feel that opinions should be expressed. I 
feel that the very basis of communication depends very strongly 
on this. This is why I have decided to follow through with an
article which touches on this matter. It is through this form of 
open communication that serious ideas are exchanged. The accuracy 
of this article should prove valuable to those who take the 
modest amount of time to consider the topics being discussed. 
Only with clarity can the subject be comprehended and any sort of 
meaning extracted from the material. This is what I have done.

	Thank you for your time. You have been most understanding 
during this posting. I regret that I couldn't explain it to you 
in more detail. I will save that for a later date. It is in the 
belief that postings that are too long get skipped that I feel
that the most appropriate thing to do now is to end this letter. 
So I will conclude by saying that I feel good about doing this.
I feel that I have contributed something that will serve to show 
you some of the more subtle details involved in communication.

		It just makes sense!

					----{ john williams }----

< You may consider this as an open invitation for opposing opinions >

(DEC E-NET)	KIRK::WILLIAMS
(UUCP)		{decvax, ucbvax, allegra}!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-kirk!williams
(ARPA)		williams%kirk.DEC@decwrl.ARPA
		williams%kirk.DEC@Purdue-Merlin.ARPA