Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice2.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice2!bwm From: bwm@ccice2.UUCP (Bradford W. Miller) Newsgroups: net.taxes Subject: Re: Things IRS won't tell you #1 Message-ID: <496@ccice2.UUCP> Date: Wed, 31-Oct-84 12:19:38 EST Article-I.D.: ccice2.496 Posted: Wed Oct 31 12:19:38 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 8-Nov-84 08:29:58 EST References: <3958@decwrl.UUCP> <486@teldata.UUCP> Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY Lines: 36 > > Bob Alpert ...decwrl!rhea!nanook!alpert > > > > There is NOWHERE in the IRS code where: > > > > * Filing of "income" tax returns is made "mandatory" or > > "required" > > > > ... If you don't believe it, > > try to get your friendly local IRS agent to show you the laws which > > > > * use the language "mandatory" or "required" in reference to > > filing tax returns. > > This information is absolutely correct. > > As reguards 26 USC 7203 ("Willful Failure to File") violations, Floyd > Wright of California in his book, _B_e_a_t__t_h_e__I_R_S_?__I__D_i_d_!, has found the > Achilles heel in the "Star Chamber" separation of the requirement and > the crime. A careful reading of the Code (Title 26) will reveal that > no court has ever been granted criminal jurisdiction over offenses > under the Code. A court must sit in usurpation of jurisdiction to > hear a tax crime case (lots of Supreme Court decisions, i.e "case law," > against usurpation of jurisdiction). > > Warren Shadwick Maybe I'm missing something, but how were all those Chicago Gangsters charged with tax evasion then? (after they could not be found guilty of any of their 'real' crimes). I mean, they were pleading the 5th on everything else, I find it hard to beleive they didn't also plead the 5th on their taxes. Anyway, they were all LOCKED UP for this 'tax evasion'. Brad Miller -- ...[rochester, cbrma, rlgvax, ritcv]!ccice5!ccice2!bwm