Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ucf-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!mcnc!duke!ucf-cs!hollis
From: hollis@ucf-cs.UUCP (William )
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: A vote *against* net.women.only
Message-ID: <1688@ucf-cs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 7-Nov-84 12:29:41 EST
Article-I.D.: ucf-cs.1688
Posted: Wed Nov  7 12:29:41 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 10-Nov-84 02:44:37 EST
References: <224@hocsj.UUCP>
Organization: UCF, Orlando, FL
Lines: 13

When I first started reading the net, it was understood (by the introduction)
that net.women.only was ONLY for women.  There is already a net.women for
discussion of ideas with women.  I do not believe that net.women.only is 
discriminitory, but put there for a specific purpose.  Since others didn't
agree with that purpose, and chose to ignore 'the rules', ie social agreements
between people on the net, we can see how little traffic there is in
net.women.only.  Why do people always want to screw things up? I duuno, just
rambling again.  The social agreement was broken, and now everybody is mad.
Oh well.


  Ken Hollis