Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 UW 5/3/83; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver (info-mac)
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: Re: Why is the Mac so slow?
Message-ID: <2329@uw-beaver>
Date: Tue, 27-Nov-84 01:23:26 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.2329
Posted: Tue Nov 27 01:23:26 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 28-Nov-84 03:51:53 EST
Sender: root@uw-beave
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 15

From: Piersol.pasa@XEROX.ARPA
The answer is that there is no good reason for MacPascal to be slow.
Other languages, particularly MacForth and the C compilers run at a
blazing speed on the Mac.  I suspect that the Macintosh Pascal system is
a little too large to fit comfortably on a 128k Mac, and therefore does
a lot of disk swaps.  If you think about it, MacPascal has a pretty
extensive set of library routines.  This is generally considered good in
a compiler, but MacPascal is interpreted, and so has to load them into
memory when they are called.  I'm willing to bet that this is a lot of
the initial load and run time.

We can hope that a compatible Pascal compiler will arrive to supplement
MacPascal.  Then we can hope for high speed AND development ease.

Kurt