Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/7/84; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!info-vax
From: info-vax@ucbvax.ARPA
Newsgroups: fa.info-vax
Subject: Re: Unibus Disks
Message-ID: <3254@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 13-Nov-84 14:28:52 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.3254
Posted: Tue Nov 13 14:28:52 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 15-Nov-84 02:37:01 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 11

From: Mike O'Brien <obrien@CSNET-SH.ARPA>

	Well, I'd probably scream a lot if given a choice between a
single UBA with DEUNA and UDA-50, and an SI 9900.  There are folks out
there who are happy with SI controllers, and folks who aren't.  On the
other hand, there seem to be few folks out there who aren't happy with
Emulex controllers.  So, a) I'd plump for an Emulex.  If I couldn't
get that, on to plan b) get the SI.  The contention between the UDA-50
and the DEUNA could get quite fierce, I think.  Also, the DEUNA eats
so much power that I'd be trying to keep as much stuff out of the UNIBUS
cabinet as I could.