Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 8/7/84; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!info-vax
From: info-vax@ucbvax.ARPA
Newsgroups: fa.info-vax
Subject: Disk Performance
Message-ID: <3277@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 14-Nov-84 13:01:59 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.3277
Posted: Wed Nov 14 13:01:59 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 15-Nov-84 03:30:20 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 15

From: muslin%ny1mm.DEC@decwrl.ARPA

An interesting article by University of Washington Medical School appeared
recently in one of the DECUS publications (the thick white book, forget the
exact title). It compares DSA disks with UDA50 and HSC controllers, MASSBUS
disks (RM03's, RMO5's, RP0x's) and Eagle disks. The conclusion of the
article is that for heavy io load HSC comes out on top, then UDA then
Eagles.

					- Victor -
x's) and Eagle disks. The conclusion of the
article is that for heavy io load HSC comes out on top, then UDA then
Eagles.

					- Victor -