Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice2!cjk
From: cjk@ccice2.UUCP (Kreilick)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Abortion and Capital Punishment
Message-ID: <509@ccice2.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 20-Nov-84 17:30:16 EST
Article-I.D.: ccice2.509
Posted: Tue Nov 20 17:30:16 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 22-Nov-84 07:18:58 EST
References: <1782@burdvax.UUCP> <779@ariel.UUCP> <359@klipper.UUCP> <642@ames.UUCP>
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 22

> 
> 	If you agree that killing is wrong once the child/fetus is no
> longer dependent on the parents, then clearly this dividing line is at
> birth. Once a child is born it can be adequately cared for by persons
> not its parents. So what is this nonsense about "when it becomes clear
> that a child is reasonable" and "age of 12"?
> 
> -  From the Crow's Nest  -                      Kenn Barry
>                                                 NASA-Ames Research Center
>                                                 Moffett Field, CA
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         Electric Avenue:              {dual,hao,menlo70,hplabs}!ames!barry

Kenn, I think you're a little out of touch.

Biep is talking about human babies, not crows.  Now, as a crow
you may well have had worms and other bugs stuffed in your beak
by other birds.  I doubt if you could have foraged for those
bugs yourself when just out of the egg.  


				- From the berry gobbler bungalow -