Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Newsgroups: net.math,net.followup,net.crypt Subject: Re: Distinguishing a Message from Random Data - Statistical approach Message-ID: <5985@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Wed, 21-Nov-84 09:33:16 EST Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.5985 Posted: Wed Nov 21 09:33:16 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 23-Nov-84 03:04:21 EST References: <166@dmcnh.UUCP> <956@cca.UUCP> Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 7 > For any particular set of statistical measures, you could obviously > generate a random message that met them and would thus seem to contain a > message, even though it didn't. I seem to recall an article about random message generation using given uniliteral, digraph, trigraph, etc. distributions not long ago in the "Computer Recreations" column in Scientific American.