Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pegasus.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!hogpc!pegasus!mzal
From: mzal@pegasus.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: C and BCD
Message-ID: <1911@pegasus.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 15-Nov-84 10:24:20 EST
Article-I.D.: pegasus.1911
Posted: Thu Nov 15 10:24:20 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 16-Nov-84 05:10:49 EST
Organization: AT&T Information Systems, Lincroft NJ
Lines: 14

If C was intended as a systems programming language, then it only seems
fair that it should be able to access all functions of the system,
including BCD on those machines which support it.  How a variable
declared as BCD should be handled on non-BCD machines is an issue
which could be left to the implementer.  Alternatively, we could
just say that all BCD variables are of type int on non-BCD machines.

I know of no standards saying that just because something is
declared char or int or double that it needs to be stored in some
special way.  IndeedGi in all versions of C which run on a DEC-20
(that I have seen), chars, ints, longs, and doubles are all 36
bit quantaties.

-- Mike^Z   [allegra!, ihnp4!] pegasus!mzal   Zaleski@Rutgers