Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site harvard.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!breuel
From: breuel@harvard.ARPA (Thomas M. Breuel)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: C needs BCD -- why BCD?  Accountants!
Message-ID: <161@harvard.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 20-Nov-84 00:26:51 EST
Article-I.D.: harvard.161
Posted: Tue Nov 20 00:26:51 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 21-Nov-84 08:51:06 EST
References: <105@ISM780B.UUCP> <869@ihuxn.UUCP> <904@umcp-cs.UUCP> <4611@utzoo.UUCP> <222@desint.UUCP>
Organization: Harvard University
Lines: 12

> ... have a general model of "read in two fields, add them,
> write it out". You can do a BCD add *much* faster than you can do two
> conversions and a 64-bit binary add. Remember that decimal conversion
> inherently involves multiplication and division.

As soon as I/O gets involved, it hardly matters which one is faster
computationally. BTW, you can do conversions using shifts and (sorry
to say that) BCD arithmetic... but you can write that in assembly
language.

						Thomas.
						(breuel@harvard).