Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mulga.OZ Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!mulga!kre From: kre@mulga.OZ (Robert Elz) Newsgroups: net.mail Subject: Re: is there a right way use to the map Message-ID: <560@mulga.OZ> Date: Mon, 26-Nov-84 22:28:49 EST Article-I.D.: mulga.560 Posted: Mon Nov 26 22:28:49 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 28-Nov-84 02:39:53 EST References: <22@politik.UUCP> <9600006@uiucdcsb.UUCP> <512@cbosgd.UUCP> Reply-To: kre@mulga.OZ (Robert Elz) Organization: Comp Sci, Melbourne Uni, Australia Lines: 33 I also have such a program, its called uumail (for the obvious reason), it also handles multiple destinations. It doesn't handle domains, as at the minute I have no real idea what the uucp domain system is finally going to be like. Its not in use here yet, as I don't have accurate enough maps to let it loose upon - some of the routes I've tried it out on are absurdly long (mostly because of the missing AT&T section, but that will come soon). It uses data generated by pathalias. My aim is to allow people in Australia to forget routing completely (we already do internally) and do all the work at mulga. Robert Elz decvax!mulga!kre ps: really, its easy to make sendmail.cf files give the backend mail for lots of hosts, you just do something like ... R$*@$-.uucp $#uucp$@fakehost$:$2!$1 in ruleset 0, then define the "uucp" mailer 'm' flag, and give its args without $h anywhere (which would always be "fakehost"), $u contains all the needed info. If the mailer returns an error (unknown host, or route, or something) you get to see "fakehost" in the sendmail transcript that's mailed back, but a little imagination can easily produce a nicer word to use there (that's its only use really). "destination" is a possibility ("Connecting to destination.uucp ...") "router" is another. Given that the mailer name is also not seen externally in any other place, calling the host "uucp" and the mailer "router" would produce Connecting to uucp.router which wouldn't be at all bad.