Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!barmar
From: barmar@mit-eddie.UUCP (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: For Your Eyes Only
Message-ID: <3124@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-Nov-84 02:02:04 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.3124
Posted: Wed Nov 14 02:02:04 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 15-Nov-84 02:28:10 EST
References: <2883@allegra.UUCP> <240@zinfandel.UUCP> <1138@bbncca.ARPA>
Reply-To: barmar@mit-eddie.UUCP (Barry Margolin)
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 19

In article <1138@bbncca.ARPA> keesan@bbncca.ARPA (Morris Keesan) writes:
>    This is getting a little silly.  I haven't seen the film, but I think it
>quite probable that the title has little if anything to do with the film.
>...
>-- 
>			    Morris M. Keesan
>			    {decvax,linus,ihnp4,wivax,wjh12,ima}!bbncca!keesan
>			    keesan @ BBN-UNIX.ARPA

Well, I have seen the film, several times.  Yes, the titles are probably
more appropriate for the novels, whose plots are usually unrelated to
the plots of the corresponding movies.  However, they usually manage to
fit the title in with the movie in some way.  In this particular case,
when Bond goes into M's office to get his assignment he is given a
dossier, which is marked "Eyes Only".
-- 
    Barry Margolin
    ARPA: barmar@MIT-Multics
    UUCP: ..!genrad!mit-eddie!barmar