Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cbosgd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!mark From: mark@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Horton) Newsgroups: net.news Subject: Re: Objection to annonymous postings Message-ID: <508@cbosgd.UUCP> Date: Mon, 19-Nov-84 17:28:47 EST Article-I.D.: cbosgd.508 Posted: Mon Nov 19 17:28:47 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 20-Nov-84 03:20:36 EST References: <112@normac.UUCP> <1258@eosp1.UUCP> Organization: Bell Labs, Columbus Lines: 30 I agree with Tony Robison. There is a parallel discussion about this subject going on in fa.telecom right now, pretaining to anonymous postings to BBS's and the legal issues about who is or is not responsible for them. While I don't think the issues are clear cut, there has been at least one instance where the police have seized a system because a credit card number was anonymously posted on that system. The erewhon case has shown that for those who know how the net works, it is indeed possible to post a forged message that can't be traced. We have no way to stop such postings. However, if we encourage anonymous postings, we are potentially liable when someone advocates an illegal activity anonymously. If you really want to post something anonymously (and I do believe there are newsgroups where this makes sense) you should go through a moderator who knows who you are. This moderator presumably will ensure that the message is not going to get somebody sued before posting it. If there is a legal problem with a message, the moderator can cancel it, and can direct authorities to the person who posted it. (I really hope it never comes down to this, but the moderator shouldn't be the one sued.) Up until now, people have used good sense and not posted things that are obviously illegal. If we all continue this way, we won't have problems. However, it would be a mistake to set up software to encourage anonymous postings, since that would open the door for an arrest or lawsuit, and it would be the system administrators who would be in trouble if it happened. Mark Horton