Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site asgb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!bmcg!asgb!gupta
From: gupta@asgb.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.nlang,net.movies
Subject: For Your Eyes Only
Message-ID: <584@asgb.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 19-Nov-84 15:17:34 EST
Article-I.D.: asgb.584
Posted: Mon Nov 19 15:17:34 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Nov-84 07:18:01 EST
Organization: Burroughs Corporation, Boulder Colo.
Lines: 15
Xref: dcdwest net.nlang:783 net.movies:2319

[  I think this discussion belongs in net.nlang  ]

The problem with this phrase is the word "only". Does it apply to "Your" or
to "Eyes"? If it applies to "Your", then the object to which this phrase
applies should not be seen by anyone else (My opinion is that this was the
intention when Ian Fleming wrote the book). If the word "only" applies to
"Eyes" it would mean that the person could look at the object but not do
anything else to it, e.g. touch it. The word "only" strikes again.

-- 
Yogesh Gupta                           Advanced Systems Group,
{sdcrdcf, sdcsvax}!bmcg!asgb!gupta     Burroughs Corp., Boulder, CO.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
	All opinions contained in this message are my own and do not
	reflect those of my employer or the plant on my desk.