Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site spp2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwspp!spp2!urban
From: urban@spp2.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Creationists vs Baby Fae
Message-ID: <252@spp2.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 12-Nov-84 11:41:49 EST
Article-I.D.: spp2.252
Posted: Mon Nov 12 11:41:49 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 15-Nov-84 03:50:34 EST
References: <266@cadovax.UUCP> <203@spp2.UUCP> <446@uwmacc.UUCP>
Reply-To: urban@spp2.UUCP (Mike urban)
Organization: TRW, Redondo Beach  CA
Lines: 17
Summary: 

>> (quote from 7th-day Adventists re Baby Fae, followed by...)
>>
>> Presumably the interchangability of parts can be taken just as
>> easily as evidence of the same creator of both species.
>> 
>> 	Mike
>
>I think that creationists might be left to make that last statement
>for themselves, if they want to.  Unless they do, you're putting
>words in their mouths.  I can say "presumably evolutionists believe
>X" but unless *they* say they believe X, my statement is not very

I choose my words very carefully.  I didn't say "presumably, these
people believe X".  I said, "presumably, someone can interpret
Y as Z."  Who's putting words in whose mouth?

	Mike