Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice2!cjk
From: cjk@ccice2.UUCP (Kreilick)
Newsgroups: net.abortion,net.politics,net.religion,net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Abortion and Capital Punishment
Message-ID: <508@ccice2.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 20-Nov-84 17:18:34 EST
Article-I.D.: ccice2.508
Posted: Tue Nov 20 17:18:34 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 22-Nov-84 07:18:33 EST
References: <1782@burdvax.UUCP> <779@ariel.UUCP> <359@klipper.UUCP> <315@qantel.UUCP>
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 54

> In article <359@klipper.UUCP> biep@klipper.UUCP (Biep) writes:
> >[]
> >	Human fetuses are no humans, and may be aborted. Since birth does
> >	not miraculously brew "humans", the only logical limit is when
> >	it becomes clear that a child is reasonable. So I think parents
> >	should have the right to "kill" their children till something
> >	like the age of 12. In fact in Japan this is already an accepted
> >	point of view. Why would it suddenly be murder t " kill" a baby
> >	that two days ago still was a "fetus" and so possible subject to
> >	abortion? The natural limit would be this: At the moment a child
> >	would be able to live after being rejected by its parents, it
> >	could. Being removed from a womb is such a form of rejection.
> >	(In fact, this is also a [Ll]ibertarian idea: nobody has the duty
> >	to care for someone else, and children are held responsible for
> >	themselves)
> >		
> >-- 
> >
> >							  Biep.
> >	{seismo|decvax|philabs}!mcvax!vu44!botter!klipper!biep
> 
> Is this supposed to be a sick joke or what?  Either this is an example of how
> ridiculous abortion is or this man wishes to be flamed to death.
>  
> I have never heard such a evil thing on this network before.  I can't believe
> people really think like this.  I hope no one else out there has this demented

Perhaps what you meant to say is that you can't believe that 
others think before spewing drivel to the net.

> view of children, whether you are pro-abortion or not.  Does this man propose
> that we set ourselves up higher than any other authority and kill children 
> because they can't take care of themselves?  I just can't believe anyone could
> say such a thing!
> 
> Since you know that I'm very conservative, you must have guessed I am anti-
> abortion.  I believe that since all life comes from God, and that a fetus is 
> alive, you are killing a creation of God when you have an abortion done.  Only
> God has the right to take away any life that He gave.  
> 
> I suppose that as time goes on, more and more liberals will view children as
> a burden and wish to get rid of them at older and older ages.
> 
> "Oh my, he cries to much.  Let's kill him and get another."  Is this what I
> will hear parents saying in the future?  How disgusting!
> 
> This man says removing a child from the womb is a form of rejection.  I say
> it is a form of murder, and the worst kind.
> --
> "...holding forth the                           Ken Nichols
>  word of life..." Phil. 2:16                    ...!ucbvax!dual!qantel!ken
> ------------------

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***