Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site watdaisy.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watdaisy!gjerawlins From: gjerawlins@watdaisy.UUCP (Greg Rawlins) Newsgroups: net.physics Subject: two questions for physicists Message-ID: <6766@watdaisy.UUCP> Date: Mon, 26-Nov-84 15:11:11 EST Article-I.D.: watdaisy.6766 Posted: Mon Nov 26 15:11:11 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 27-Nov-84 03:55:02 EST Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 33 ["I don't want millions, I just want answers to my questions"] Here are some more questions that have kept me awake at night, can anyone out there in netland answer them for me? (1) - Over the past little while there's been a lot of discussion on the net of "semi-cosmological" issues, my question is extremely simple. How can we talk about events which occurred when the universe was 10**-43 seconds old? Can such a concept as TIME exist when all the things we use to measure it are coalesced into one huge ball of superhot matter? For example, the best timepieces we have right now are atomic clocks, can we speak about a "time" before even atoms existed? (2) - What justification is there for the omnipresent assumption that all sub-nuclear particles are the *same*. Are they indistinguishable because they are so small relative to any measuring device that any deviance cannot be detected? Or is it just an assumption about the sub-nuclear world that we've made and never thought about? ------ "These people were so amazingly primitive they still thought that digital watches were a pretty neat idea." -- /-----------------------------------------------------\ |Mail :Greg Rawlins :Department of Computer Science | | allegra\ U.of Waterloo,Waterloo,Ont.N2L3G1| | clyde \ \ | |UUCP :decvax ---- watmath --- watdaisy --- gjerawlins| | ihnp4 / / | | linus / | |CSNET:gjerawlins%watdaisy@waterloo.csnet | \-----------------------------------------------------/