Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!mwm
From: mwm@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Comments on the Libertarian Platform
Message-ID: <22400041@ea.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 21-Nov-84 14:09:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ea.22400041
Posted: Wed Nov 21 14:09:00 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Nov-84 03:37:55 EST
References: <2775@ucbcad.UUCP>
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #R:ucbcad:-277500:ea:22400041:000:771
Nf-From: ea!mwm    Nov 21 13:09:00 1984

/***** ea:net.politics / hocsj!ecl / 11:37 pm  Nov 18, 1984 */
Unravelling the negatives here, the platform is in favor of allowing
adults-only apartments.  But that is sanctioned discrimination against
children!

					Evelyn C. Leeper
					...ihnp4!hocsj!ecl
/* ---------- */

So? If you look hard enough, you will find that the Libertarians don't have
any arguments about people doing what they wish with their property, which
includes renting it, or not renting it, to whome they please. So, as a
landlord, I can discriminte against children, blacks, whites, blue-eyed
blonds, ex girlfriends, or people who own three-piece suites.

If it's my property, what's the beef? But since I'm only renting it from
the government, they can make such activities illegal.

	<mike