Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!jlg
From: jlg@lanl.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.puzzle
Subject: Re: Re: A puzzle with two answers?!?
Message-ID: <16570@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 21-Nov-84 13:11:09 EST
Article-I.D.: lanl.16570
Posted: Wed Nov 21 13:11:09 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 23-Nov-84 07:37:44 EST
References: <576@asgb.UUCP> <874@sunybcs.UUCP>
Sender: newsreader@lanl.ARPA
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 5

There is only one answer.  What the first native said was unintelligable,
so the second native was lying (how could he know what the first one said
either).  The second native must be tall since he lied,  the first must
be tall because the secont said he was short, the third was short for 
reasons stated before in this exchange.