Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Christian Love (gleaning what one likes from the Bible) Message-ID: <280@pyuxd.UUCP> Date: Tue, 20-Nov-84 12:29:13 EST Article-I.D.: pyuxd.280 Posted: Tue Nov 20 12:29:13 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Nov-84 02:43:13 EST References: <1899@ucla-cs.ARPA> <460@uwmacc.UUCP> Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J. Lines: 41 > I guess you can assume what you wish; however, when you go to the > Bible, you will find that although Jesus Christ did indeed talk of > love and acceptance (tolerance I'm not so sure about), He also said > a few things about Hell. [PAUL DUBOIS] That's the beauty of the bible, there's something in it for everyone. Yes, it has talk of universal love for those who would like to see the world as a place of universal love. But it also has great parts about hell and god's wrath, for those who don't want to see the world in the above way (so much so that they just skip over the parts on tolerance that they're "not so sure about"), but rather in a way conforming to their preconceptions about the world, the lowliness of humans, the wrath of god, etc. Amazing how a book of divine truth, the exact unswerving unambiguous word of god, is interpreted in so many ways by so many people. Maybe when god "gave" us the bible as the unambiguous truth, he was trying to tell us something: that when you've got a billion people you'll have a billion perspectives on the "truth", and that one shouldn't expect god or anything else to provide some universal code applicable to everyone. After all, if the word of god is interpreted in a billion different ways, then it's clearly not as unambiguous as was "intended". I'm sure there's an explanation for this, akin to "It's Satan (that old devil) who's leading *others* (not them, of course) astray with the 'wrong' interpretation!" or "It's all in the plan of God!", or ... (See, even the explanations aren't consistent. Says something, no?) > "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hand of the living God". It is more fearful to fall into the hands of a religious believer who presumes to know the truth about what god wants, especially when he tries to "help" you do what's best for you (according to him, of course). > God is love, yes. God is wrath as well. Sorry. Why be sorry? After all, that's the way it IS, not merely what you choose to believe, right? :-? -- AT THE TONE PLEASE LEAVE YOUR NAME AND NET ADDRESS. THANK YOU. Rich Rosen pyuxd!rlr