Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.17 $; site uokvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uokvax!emjej From: emjej@uokvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Why is there evil? Message-ID: <8300065@uokvax.UUCP> Date: Sun, 25-Nov-84 19:21:00 EST Article-I.D.: uokvax.8300065 Posted: Sun Nov 25 19:21:00 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 28-Nov-84 02:00:04 EST References: <1001@umcp-cs.UUCP> Lines: 37 Nf-ID: #R:umcp-cs:-100100:uokvax:8300065:000:1485 Nf-From: uokvax!emjej Nov 25 18:21:00 1984 /***** uokvax:net.religion / noscvax!walker / 1:18 am Nov 20, 1984 */ In my opinion: God gave us Free Will in this world. That means we have the ability, responsibility, freedom to make choices. If we weren't allowed to make 'bad' choices (i.e. those that hurt ourselves or others) then we wouldn't really have free will, would we? I also believe that those who are innocently hurt by others' bad choices will eventually be recompensed far beyond whatever they may have had to endure. Also, if we make a bad choice we will continue to be given the same 'test' until, hopefully, we get it right. /* ---------- */ The notion of God executing for x in `ls human` do (while ChooseEvil $x do GiveAnotherChance $x done) & done is as hard to reconcile with the supposed goodness of God as the usual for x in `ls human` do (if ChooseEvil $x then Fry $x fi) & done because arbitrary large finite quantities of suffering can still occur. It seems as though creating humans without free will so they always do the "right thing" would be a lot shorter way to get to the same postcondition. (I myself lean towards Smullyan's comparison of a sentient being exercising free will with a rock in free fall.) James Jones (While explaining things to my parents, I've said that there were those who were convinced that the computers in heaven run Unix and that God is a C hacker, but I still can't believe I did this... :-> )