Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mmm.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!mmm!leon From: leon@mmm.UUCP (Leon Schilmoeller) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: Re: UNIX vs VMS (or here we go again....) Message-ID: <120@mmm.UUCP> Date: Sat, 24-Nov-84 10:52:09 EST Article-I.D.: mmm.120 Posted: Sat Nov 24 10:52:09 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 25-Nov-84 03:46:44 EST References: <5906@brl-tgr.ARPA> Organization: 3M Company, St. Paul, Minn. Lines: 35 > > I also have mixed VMS/Unix vaxes, and additionally have Unix on > multiple machines other than my vaxes. Every complaint you level > against VMS is true for Unix. > > *roff as a word processor, Why not TeX? How about databases? > if you don't have 4bsd, where do you get your network support? And if > you think DECUS is fun for software, how about net.sources (provided > you have a version of uucp/readnews that work together?) > > But UNIX is giving me a different headache. I now have three > kinds of computers running five kinds of Unix. Programs from Version X > won't run under Version Y, operator procedures are radically different, > and the user interface varies. > > The REAL point I would like to make isn't that VMS is superior to > UNIX in any sense. (For each place where VMS is better, some version > of UNIX is better somewhere else, and otherwise. . .) > > The REAL point is that a system which was integrated and well > supported would allow more people to do more productive work than a > system full of odd variants, half thought out ideas, and large > quantities of Bugs. > > So why can't we herd UNIX off in that direction? > > Marty > > ---------- I marvel at all of the article referring to RUNOFF, nroff, *off as word processing packages. I like to refer to them as text formatters and useful for documentation preparation, but I would not necessarily call them word processors. OA users would probably find difficulty in relating these packages to word processing also!