Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!internet!Lauren Weinstein <vortex!lauren@RAND-UNIX.ARPA>
From: Lauren@internet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: UNIX trademark
Message-ID: <6030@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 23-Nov-84 12:57:41 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.6030
Posted: Fri Nov 23 12:57:41 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Nov-84 08:40:50 EST
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 8

That's correct.  Less important than the issue of "does EVERY article
that mentions the system properly note the trademark" is 
"did AT&T make a genuine effort to make sure that people realized
the trademarked status of the term?"

I don't think anyone can argue that they haven't made the effort.

--Lauren--