Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ames.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!nsc!ames!eugene From: eugene@ames.UUCP (Eugene Miya) Newsgroups: net.unix Subject: Interesting observation -- "one true unix" Message-ID: <650@ames.UUCP> Date: Mon, 19-Nov-84 17:46:48 EST Article-I.D.: ames.650 Posted: Mon Nov 19 17:46:48 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 21-Nov-84 04:57:21 EST Distribution: net Organization: NASA-Ames Research Center, Mtn. View, CA Lines: 31 I realize that lots of novice Unix system administrators read this group, but here goes... Several people were having a discussion in my office the other day. Two were from IBM/CDC backgrounds and were new to Unix. Both were in some positions of `authority.' One stated that with all of our VAXen, workstations and other big UNIX systems that we should all `standardize' on System 5. e.g. there should be one favor of UNIX. With all these UNIXes around, how were users going to be helped with more than one favor of UNIX around (currently our users need to know VMS (for most VAXen), COS- for our Crays, and with they are learning UNIX for Irises). Another person in the room felt under attack. The VAXen are running 4.2. He and others argued that the different `dialects' of UNIX didn't matter that much and that the differences between 4.2 and SV are smaller than VMS to COS for instance. My observation is that this is perhaps a left over attitude from the days of the card punch/centralized computer facility. They desire control over everything. It doesn't matter that the erase character can be changed between Backspce or Delete, just make them the same. Don't give the user the choice of vi or emacs, standardize so we have to maintain less. Any ideas for defending our bastion of 4.2 from the hordes of the SV bastion? We have tried the obvious "different and better tools." This works only so far. --eugene miya NASA Ames Res. Ctr. {hplabs,ihnp4,dual,hao,vortex}!ames!aurora!eugene emiya@ames-vmsb.ARPA