Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site spp2.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwspp!spp2!jhull From: jhull@spp2.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women,net.flame Subject: Re: Morley Safer on Burning Brides Message-ID: <263@spp2.UUCP> Date: Tue, 20-Nov-84 15:37:36 EST Article-I.D.: spp2.263 Posted: Tue Nov 20 15:37:36 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 22-Nov-84 06:40:15 EST References: <1851@nsc.UUCP> Reply-To: jhull@spp2.UUCP (Jeff Hull) Distribution: net Organization: TRW, Redondo Beach CA Lines: 30 Xref: genrad net.women:3996 net.flame:7308 Summary: In article <1851@nsc.UUCP> srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian) writes: >* Tonight I saw Morley Safer's report on "60 Minutes" about > the practice of burning Indian brides to death. > > The main point of this posting is to comment on (flame > about) Morley Safer's editorial commentary. He begins by > contrasting the fight against this practice with the fight > here for the ERA -- implying that American women's problems > are small by comparison. He fails to see the parallel > between the horrors that he's reporting and the systematic > terrorizing of American women. Rape. Violent pornography. > Domestic violence. Lobotomy and shock treatment. "Random" > violence. Mass murders. > I see some lack of parallelism in Mateosian's argument: the Indian situation is directed only at women while the American parallel he draws affects both genders. I fail to see that the ERA will have substantive effect on the American situation he describes; all the things he mentions are already legally the same for both genders (all are illegal no matter who the victim is except "lobotomy and shock treatment" which are regulated by medical professionals). -- Blessed Be, jhull@spp2.UUCP Jeff Hull trwspp!spp2!jhull@trwrb.UUCP 13817 Yukon Ave. Hawthorne, CA 90250