Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site uwmacc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!rick
From: rick@uwmacc.UUCP (the absurdist)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.women.only
Subject: Re: proposed removal of net.women.only
Message-ID: <471@uwmacc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 19-Nov-84 18:28:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uwmacc.471
Posted: Mon Nov 19 18:28:00 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 22-Nov-84 07:47:19 EST
References: <209@calmasd.UUCP>
Reply-To: rick@maccunix.UUCP (Rick Keir)
Organization: UWisconsin-Madison Academic Comp Center
Lines: 28
Summary: 

In article <209@calmasd.UUCP> gail@calmasd.UUCP (Gail B. Hanrahan) writes:
>If David DiGiacomo doesn't want net.women.only on his own
>machine, he doesn't have to accept it from his news feed
>(assuming it is under his control).  Likewise for those who
>agree with him that net.women.only is "a waste of net
>resources".
>Long Live Net.women.only!
>Gail Bayley Hanrahan
>{ihnp4,decvax,ucbvax}!sdcsvax!calmasd!gail

Right.  And if David is administrator for a backbone machine, it is ok
with you that everyone getting their newsfeed from him can do without
it also, right?  

	How about if the name gets changed to net.rabid.feminists?
(As opposed to net.feminists, a name which implies that men 
might be acceptable also?) 

	I'm sure David D. wouldn't care about the group name, then.
What's that?  The name is offensive?  But it's only so that women
can have their own space without MEN interfering!  
-- 
"The weight of the world is love." -- Allan Ginsberg

Rick Keir -- MicroComputer Information Center, MACC
1210 West Dayton St/U Wisconsin Madison/Mad WI 53706

{allegra, ihnp4, seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!rick