Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!ron
From: ron@brl-tgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Hi-fi floppies?
Message-ID: <7765@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Sun, 27-Jan-85 17:50:39 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.7765
Posted: Sun Jan 27 17:50:39 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 30-Jan-85 05:59:39 EST
References: <374@nbs-amrf.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 10

>  The reviewer said that, while the sound may not
> be up to par with CD's, he felt it at least measured up to any
> vinyl (or was it any analog medium?) around.

Foo.  If he said vinyl, he's off base.  CD's only advantage over vinyl
is surface noise immunity.  It's that magnetic tape that causes you most
of your problems.  However direct to disk mastering never really caught
on.  Even the new Beta-HiFi challenges CD's

-Ron