Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hou4b.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!ariel!hou4b!dhd
From: dhd@hou4b.UUCP (D.H.Dawdy)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: "hot" new car from Ford!Europe
Message-ID: <1295@hou4b.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Jan-85 14:00:35 EST
Article-I.D.: hou4b.1295
Posted: Wed Jan 23 14:00:35 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Jan-85 07:34:01 EST
References: <221@oblio.UUCP>, <859@watdcsu.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 16

It figures a "hot" new car would result in "flames".
....not everyone defines "hot" the same way.
....not everyone wants the same thing from a car.

Some people define performance with longevity, some
with handling, and some with acceleration;
actually, performance should include all of these, plus...

I find it a curious and juvenile thing that those who like cars
with superb handling like to scoff at those who have an
affinity for cars with less handling and greater quickness.
And, it's also a curious thing that those who like the quickness
scoff at those who get their kicks in the curves.

It should be obvious that each model has it's own
advantages and disadvantages.