Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site leadsv.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amdcad!cae780!leadsv!chris From: chris@leadsv.UUCP (Christopher Salander) Newsgroups: net.auto,net.consumers Subject: Re: New car shopping Message-ID: <363@leadsv.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30-Jan-85 19:36:04 EST Article-I.D.: leadsv.363 Posted: Wed Jan 30 19:36:04 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 11:29:25 EST Distribution: net Organization: LMSC-LEADS, Sunnyvale, Ca. Lines: 56 Xref: watmath net.auto:5596 net.consumers:1760 > > Comments? --J. Abeles. > Yes!! I went through the same process you described! I am 6'4" and cannot tolerate driving is a seat that is tilted too much. As a result, I found that I cannot fit in: 1) ALL Japanese cars ( the Mazda 626 came close, though). 2) ALL French and Italian cars. 3) ALL British cars except the Jaguars. 4) ALL German cars except the largest Mercedes. 5) ALL American cars that are "compact", "subcompact", or "sporty". The April issue of Consumer Reports is an excellent reference for buying a car. I found all its numbers to be close to what I discovered for myself. Use their size table to figure out if you can fit in a car. It saves visiting all those car lots. Also, I will not fit in a Volvo if it has a a sun roof. My father has either fixed cars, sold cars, or registered cars for about 40 years now. He says, given any amount of money, he would buy the 12 cylinder Jaguar as "the best car made today". Given an engineer's income, he recommends a Volvo. (Everyone I know who has a Volvo has had no problems, but this is California). Since I presently have the same car the police use (an V8 Plymouth), I also want POWER. Since I cannot afford a Jag., and the Volvo is under-powered, I have decided that my preference would be for a Ford Thunderbird. The Thunderbird - 1. It has the room 2. It has the power (V6 or V8) 3. Good mileage (not great) 4. Very reliable, compared to other U.S. cars The Cougar is suppose to be even more reliable, but it has a lot of fancy extras that I don't want to pay for, and the designer is uglier. Why not Chrysler? - Almost all their cars have no power, except the ones that are too small for me. The one V8 model left gets 12 MPG, and is very unreliable. Why not GM? - Most of the cars are too plain, and are more unreliable than other U.S. cars. A Buick might be a possibility, but think of all the cruisin' music that you can play that's been written about T-birds!!