Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!duke!crm
From: crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin)
Newsgroups: net.books
Subject: Re: Re. Porn debate
Message-ID: <5343@duke.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 31-Jan-85 13:16:10 EST
Article-I.D.: duke.5343
Posted: Thu Jan 31 13:16:10 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Feb-85 07:47:27 EST
References: <376@decwrl.UUCP>
Reply-To: crm@duke.UUCP (Charlie Martin)
Organization: Duke University
Lines: 27
Summary: 

In article <376@decwrl.UUCP> arndt@lymph.DEC writes:
>Yes, PLEASE move the porn debate elsewhere!!!!!
> ...
	< much other discussion posted to net.followup and net.flame,
	  I only post the part that seems reasonably related to net.books
	>

>Paul Dubuc took the time to give his usual calm reasoned - yes yes reasoned -
>answer and gets flamed at by boo boos like Tim M. who misunderstand the
	... better to be a booboo than reason like BamBam: this
	psuedoargument ("flamed at by boo boos...") is called the *ad
	hominem (abusive)* argument.

>Constitution.  NO ONE has an absolute right to print ANYTHING - never did.
	... funny, I always *thought* I understand the Constitution,
	and funny, that's the way *I* read it.  "The right of freedom of the
	press... shall not be abridged."  Seems pretty explicit.

	 -- rest in net.followup and net.flame --

	 See, I tried! Honest!

-- 
		Opinions stated here are my own and are unrelated.

				Charlie Martin
				(...mcnc!duke!crm)