Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site diku.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!mcvax!diku!kimcm
From: kimcm@diku.UUCP (Kim Christian Madsen.)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Confining the pornography debate
Message-ID: <749@diku.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 3-Feb-85 16:57:18 EST
Article-I.D.: diku.749
Posted: Sun Feb  3 16:57:18 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 6-Feb-85 04:50:49 EST
References: <206@ttidcc.UUCP> <20980089@cmu-cs-k.ARPA>
Reply-To: kimcm@diku.UUCP (Kim Christian Madsen.)
Organization: DIKU, U of Copenhagen, DK
Lines: 27
Summary: 

In article <20980089@cmu-cs-k.ARPA> tim@cmu-cs-k.ARPA (Tim Maroney) writes:
>...
>So I suppose the question is: Does the network have any interest in sex?

Hey you've got a point there, but how the h... can it be done
via those f**king terminals :-)

Honestly sex is nearly always in the mind of anybody, whether he/she thinks
of doing it right now on impulse, or he/she thinks of it more abstract,
or just makes a moral judgement on some [obscene] words/pictures/movements/etc.

So I think the network has a great common interest in sex! The question is then
is the network interested in discussing sex/porn/perversions/love/failures/new
variations/legality/morality/<you may continue>?

I for one don't think that the network is the right forum to discuss such 
matters. I prefer to talk about sex with some of my friends, mostly because
it's to personal for me to just burst out with to totally strangers! and an-
other reason is that you can better do such discussions when you can see and
judge the other persons interpretation of what you've just told him/her. And
the last argument is that if the discussions should be about sexual problems
isn't friends the best to help you solve them?
[if you got any problems/friends :-)]
-- 
				Kim Chr. Madsen.  Institute of Datalogy, 
						  University of Copenhagen
				{decvax,philabs,seismo}!mcvax!diku!kimcm