Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version VT1.00C 11/1/84; site vortex.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!vortex!lauren From: lauren@vortex.UUCP (Lauren Weinstein) Newsgroups: net.news.stargate Subject: Re: Printer and publishers: a proposal for monitoring Message-ID: <542@vortex.UUCP> Date: Mon, 4-Feb-85 17:52:15 EST Article-I.D.: vortex.542 Posted: Mon Feb 4 17:52:15 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 6-Feb-85 05:19:38 EST References: <218@chalmers.UUCP> Organization: Vortex Technology, Los Angeles Lines: 29 It seems likely that the more people that have to sign something, the less likely we are to get people to participate. For example, I write for a national magazine. I wasn't forced to sign a document taking resposibility for anything of mine that they might publish that might cause a problem. I would probably refuse to sign such a statement, since I don't have any final control over what they publish. Since they are the publishers, I assume that they will take the responsibility for what they decide is appropriate to print. I doubt very much if very many people would be willing to accept personal legal responsibility for material they moderate in an actual service. I also have a suspicion that if push came to shove, the provider of the service would still be held responsible, on the grounds that a "only the moderators have responsibility" system is an irresponsible transfer of control over the medium. I'm just speculating on this last point, of course. I just don't think too many individuals, many without lawyers to consult easily, would be willing to accept personal responsibility. --Lauren-- P.S. It should be kept in mind at all times that there is no "information monopoly" involved in all of this. People are free to continue using whatever other mediums they see fit to pass around information. A stargate-type service would simply be another avenue from which people could choose to accept information if they so desired. --LW--