Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ncoast.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!cwruecmp!atvax!ncoast!bsa
From: bsa@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery (the tame hacker on the North Coast))
Newsgroups: net.news.stargate
Subject: Re: Need for Stargate screening?
Message-ID: <552@ncoast.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 20-Jan-85 11:25:24 EST
Article-I.D.: ncoast.552
Posted: Sun Jan 20 11:25:24 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Jan-85 19:13:15 EST
References: <373@hercules.UUCP> <3271@alice.UUCP> <1592@qubix.UUCP>
Reply-To: bsa@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery (the tame hacker on the North Coast))
Organization: The North Coast Xenix System, Cleveland
Lines: 22
Summary: 

> Article <1592@qubix.UUCP>, from msc@qubix.UUCP (Mark Callow)
+----------------
| > The moderation of Stargate vs. the unmoderation of the rest of USENET is
| > completely analogous to what you may view on commercial TV vs. what you may
| > view on cable TV. Commercial TV is broadcast (this is THE KEY WORD) intothe
| > homes of people who expect to see things having some modicum of taste;
| 
| This is a complete red herring.  The stargate data is only visible if you
| misadjust your TV set and then it only appears in the form of white dots
| running along the top of the picture.  People could not accidently see
| the *content* of the stargate broadcasts.

What are you *talking* about?  What he said is:  Stargate moderation
is to the Usenet net.all as Commercial TV is to Cable TV.  He did NOT
say that you can watch the Usenet on TV.

--bsa
-- 
   Brandon Allbery @ decvax!cwruecmp!ncoast!bsa (..ncoast!tdi1!bsa business)
6504 Chestnut Road, Independence, Ohio 44131  +1 216 524 1416 (or what have you)
     Who said you had to be (a) a poor programmer or (b) a security hazard
			       to be a hacker?