Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site axiom.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!decvax!linus!axiom!smk From: smk@axiom.UUCP (Steven M. Kramer) Newsgroups: net.news.stargate Subject: Re: Moderate landline Usenet first? Message-ID: <19@axiom.UUCP> Date: Sat, 19-Jan-85 16:13:40 EST Article-I.D.: axiom.19 Posted: Sat Jan 19 16:13:40 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jan-85 07:38:20 EST References: <494@vortex.UUCP> <1917@sun.uucp> <703@cbosgd.UUCP> Organization: Axiom Technology, Newton MA Lines: 29 >mark@cbosgd.UUCP Message-ID: <703@cbosgd.UUCP> >For those of us who have seen TAP (it's the publication by the phone phreaks, >the ones who tell you how to make free phone calls - hardly what I would >call a "magazine", more like a xeroxed newsletter) and the ARPANET (whose >inhabitants live in mortal fear of being yanked off if they misuse what >is really a military network), this is hardly surprising. My guess is that Good point. >such a posting (telling that it's suspended publication because it's been >torched) would make it past a Usenet moderator. On the other hand, >if it contained excerpts from TAP telling how to build a blue box, chances >are it would not get past. Interesting. Considering the bulk of USENET sites are ATT, I guess this is true :) I couldn't resist. Actually, I'm for moderated groups too. From what I've seem the past 2-3 years, the net is in good hands. The unmoderated net itself will collapse from dribble and new users getting a `feel' for the net. I really sense paranoia out there. If the net does turn into fascism, those of us who perceive it as such can simply take the software and run a parallel net. I think, however, both apathy and a realization that some control is required will make the moderated net the mainstream for many of us. -- --steve kramer {allegra,genrad,ihnp4,utzoo,philabs,uw-beaver}!linus!axiom!smk (UUCP) linus!axiom!smk@mitre-bedford (MIL)