Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!hao!acad
From: acad@hao.UUCP (Dan Packman Acad Bob Chatfield)
Newsgroups: net.periphs,net.micro
Subject: Re: Want advice on small printers
Message-ID: <1347@hao.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Jan-85 00:36:34 EST
Article-I.D.: hao.1347
Posted: Tue Jan 22 00:36:34 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Jan-85 01:35:58 EST
References: <450@digi-g.UUCP> <1650@fritz.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 29
Xref: dcdwest net.periphs:351 net.micro:4547

> For under $600 you will have a tough time getting a dot
> matrix printer to come very close to letter quality.
> 
>              ...   I do not consider a dot matrix
> to be acceptable letter quality unless I cannot tell the
> difference between its characters and those of a daisy
> wheel printer.  The only printers which came even close to
> meeting this specification cost more than $1000.
> 
I'm pretty happy with the Toshiba 1340, which retails for around
$750, and in one add for under $700.

In some ways, it appears superior to daisy wheels -- the letters
appear more uniform, more like a good typewriter.  Daisy wheels seem
to degenerate to produce rather uneven impressions with their letters,
and eventually wear and look like a dirty typewriter.

The Toshiba typeface is not perfect, but the dots appear much harder
to find than with the LQ-1500 of Epson and perhaps the TI.

However, you must put up with a graphics description that differs
from the Epson MX/FX standard.

Anyone programmed up an Epson -> Toshiba dot-graphics translator?

			Robert Chatfield
			seismo!hao!acad
			National Center for Atmospheric Research
			Boulder  Colorado 80307