Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ratex.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!ratex!mck From: mck@ratex.UUCP (Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan) Newsgroups: net.politics,net.philosophy Subject: Re: Re: Vulgar Libertarians Message-ID: <779@ratex.UUCP> Date: Tue, 22-Jan-85 19:27:03 EST Article-I.D.: ratex.779 Posted: Tue Jan 22 19:27:03 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 23-Jan-85 19:29:11 EST Distribution: net Organization: Terran Mystery Poodles Lines: 37 Xref: watmath net.politics:7083 net.philosophy:1376 >> Libertarianism is a POLITICAL philosophy; nothing more. >>It is NOT a general theory of ethics, meta-ethics, epistemology, or ontology. >>For example: IT IS NOT A THEORY OF ETHICAL RELATIVISM!! Some Libertarians >>are Relativists; some (in fact: MOST) are not. Libertarianism, PER SE, has >>little to say on the matter. >How can you have politics without ethics? If you're not going to respond to what I actually said, at least have the good sense not to quote me! I said Libertarianism is not a 'general theory of ethics' (note the word 'general'). The point was -- and is -- that Libertarianism, PER SE, is a political philosophy; considerations of a non- political nature are simply not treated by Libertarianism. >> 2) As any half-assed philosopher realized before he reached puberty, >> the logical conclusion of Relativism is Nihilism. >Not at all... The logical conclusion of relativism is subjectivism, but >if you can't take that you become a nihilist... Unless you adopt Nihilism, any subjective truth can be reformulated as an objective truth. > But this isn't >net.philosophy... I certainly would have preferred confining this discussion to net.philosophy, but vulgar Libertarians were posting Relativism, and calling it 'Libertarianism', in net.politics. Back to you, Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan Chief Agitator, Terran Mystery Poodles (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Galatic Mystery Poodles)