Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site uwmacc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!myers From: myers@uwmacc.UUCP (Jeff Myers) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Cipriani's Withering Away of the State -- Response to Myers Message-ID: <695@uwmacc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 25-Jan-85 14:47:53 EST Article-I.D.: uwmacc.695 Posted: Fri Jan 25 14:47:53 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 30-Jan-85 06:33:38 EST References: <780@ratex.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: UWisconsin-Madison Academic Comp Center Lines: 28 > > >Hm. In the sense that all human activity is political. Money IS condensed > >power in societies which use it. For a recent neo-Weberian outlook on > >the concept of power in the US, check out JK Galbraith's new book. > > > >Jeff Myers, the ex-Ohioan > > 1) No, not 'In the sense that all human activity is political', but, rather, in > the sense that governmental activity is political. I gave the specific example > of the case of the FCC, and indicated where you could find other examples. > It's good policy to read what you attempt to respond to; try it some time. > 2) In the concluding section, I implicitly acknowledged that money is a form of > power; I also made some important points about the distinctions among various > forms of power. It's good policy to read what you attempt to respond to; try > it sometime. > > Up to my knees in disgust, > Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan The section I originally responded to was making the point that the powerful people in society gain their power mostly thru political rather than economic means. Was that what you intended to say? Whatever, you sound like the type who would be into Galbraith, so I thought I'd mention his latest book, which he was on campus plugging at a conference sponsored by Physicians for Social Responsibility. Up to my knees in work, Jeffrey Deane Myers