Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP Path: utzoo!dciem!nrcaero!pesnta!amd!nsc!chuqui From: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuqui) Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: Another bad SF movie Message-ID: <2288@nsc.UUCP> Date: Sat, 26-Jan-85 21:58:17 EST Article-I.D.: nsc.2288 Posted: Sat Jan 26 21:58:17 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 28-Jan-85 02:16:44 EST References: <297@topaz.ARPA> <1033@druri.UUCP> <385@utcs.UUCP> Reply-To: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuqui) Organization: The Warlocks Cave Lines: 27 Summary: In article <385@utcs.UUCP> jjchew@utcs.UUCP (John Chew) writes: >What? A discussion on bad SF movies without one mention of John Carpenter's >"Dark Star"? An alien mascot made out of a spray-painted beach-ball? Space >effects where they don't bother trying to hide the wires? EEEKKKK! Scoundrel! Cad! Dark Star is a marvelous piece of fluff. It was really a senior (masters?) project that made it out into the 'real' world. No budget to worry about, so everything was done with ingenuity (I LOVED the spacesuits-- silver trashbags, duct tape (without hamsters), half the kitchen, a few pieces of styrofoam and a popcorn popper. It's funny. It's not bad, and it actually has a number of interesting social statements in it (one of my favorite 'beat society in the head films', along with Dr. Strangelove, Rollerball, and Boy and His Dog). What's even better is watching Dark Star a few times, and then going to a theater and watching the film they did WITH a budget-- I got more than a few funny looks for guffawing through a screening of Alien, but the in-jokes they tossed in pointing back at their 'cult' film to keep you going through most of the movie.... -- From the ministry of silly talks: Chuq Von Rospach {allegra,cbosgd,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!chuqui nsc!chuqui@decwrl.ARPA God is a trademark of AT&T Bell Labs --- National Semiconductor does not require useless disclaimers on posted material that is obviously not posted by company spokesmen...