Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site randvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!edhall
From: edhall@randvax.UUCP (Ed Hall)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.singles
Subject: Re: Ann Landers Survey
Message-ID: <2261@randvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 21-Jan-85 12:26:49 EST
Article-I.D.: randvax.2261
Posted: Mon Jan 21 12:26:49 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jan-85 06:38:55 EST
References: <1117@pyuxa.UUCP> <55@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.women:4225 net.singles:5576

> ----------
> > How about it, netters (male and female)? - Which do you prefer:
> > 1) Sex, 2) a hug, 3) reading Ann Landers, 4) none of the above (for Jeff :-)
> ----------

If I could choose only one, I'd choose hugs over sex, too.  Sex without
hugs is almost unthinkable!  But if I was assured of having the hugs
either way, I think I'd give the same answer as almost any red-blooded...
human!

All in all, reading Ann Landers is a poor substitute for hugs *or* sex.

		-Ed Hall
		decvax!randvax!edhall

P.S. A survey like Ann Lander's has so many uncertainties and built-in
biases that it is far worse than worthless.  A net survey isn't much
better--but it's fun!  :-)