Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP Path: utzoo!dciem!nrcaero!pesnta!amd!nsc!chuqui From: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Living in sin? Message-ID: <2297@nsc.UUCP> Date: Thu, 31-Jan-85 13:31:57 EST Article-I.D.: nsc.2297 Posted: Thu Jan 31 13:31:57 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 1-Feb-85 21:34:19 EST References: <201@tekred.UUCP> <556@ukma.UUCP> Reply-To: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach) Organization: The Village Lines: 27 Summary: In article <556@ukma.UUCP> red@ukma.UUCP (Red Varth) writes: >Fer my money, living together before marriage is no guarantee that the >marriage will work. I have a couple friends who tried it, living together >for 2 years in one case, and 3 years in the other. Both marriages broke >up rather acrimoniously. (In one case, He walked in on Her and His best >friend.) True, but living together IS a good indication that the marriage won't work-- if you live together and it doesn't work, marriage makes it worse. The legal paperworks involved in dissolving a marriage (and the psychological aspects of having to do all of it) make it a much worse situation. You can stop living together much easier than you can stop being married. It'll still hurt, but the hurt won't be artificially dragged out for the 9-12 months it will take to convince the state you live in that you really, honestly, truely cross your heart and hope to die never want to see your partners face ever again (which you have to say, even if it isn't true, or they'll suggest counselling). If they made it as difficult to GET married as they did to get un-married there would be a lot less failed marriages, because it would discourage those that were getting married for the wrong reasons. chuq -- From the ministry of silly talks: Chuq Von Rospach {allegra,cbosgd,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!chuqui nsc!chuqui@decwrl.ARPA Life, the Universe, and lots of other stuff is a trademark of AT&T Bell Labs