Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac From: info-mac@uw-beaver Newsgroups: fa.info-mac Subject: Re: Douglas Electronics Program Message-ID: <499@uw-beaver> Date: Thu, 24-Jan-85 04:20:14 EST Article-I.D.: uw-beave.499 Posted: Thu Jan 24 04:20:14 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 25-Jan-85 05:38:55 EST Sender: daemon@uw-beaver Organization: U of Washington Computer Science Lines: 39 From: tektronix!hplabs!hpda!dmsd!bass@uw-beaver.arpa I have been using the PC Cad program for about 2 weeks tring to do a 6 X 11" single board micro layout. The program is a GREAT start at a PC CAD tool for the MAC. But I use the word START more strongly than you might observe .... after talking with management at DE ... they have several development efforts underway for improvements requested by Bishop .... they expect BG to market the program in the $200-$300 range with the plotter and interchange file stuff added. That will be a REAL Bargin. Now the the bad parts ... the program uses VERY poor update algorithms for redrawing the screen, handling windows, and doing scrolling ... and is impossibly SLOW. A 4 X 9 memory array tightly interconnected requires more than several seconds to redraw ... and since layout requires zooming in on a small section of the board and any movement redraws the screen ... every action with that many objects takes 6-10 seconds minimum. When I talked to DE about the problem they responded that they hadn't intended it to be used for such large designs .... I would guess that a 10 to 20 chip board is about the practical limit untill the next release ... unless you have a lot of time to spend waiting for it to redraw. Besides the problem of it not being useful for real product sized boards .. 25-45 chip boards ... its only other problems are VERY MINOR glitchs like tring to grab the scroll boxes sometimes causes it to jump when you close the mouse button (like it thought the pointer was not over a box). Since the problems should be easy to fix I would give them an A+ on overall design and effort and an A- on implementation. Waiting the the next release from BG ... John --- John Bass DMS Design (System Performance and Arch Consultants) {dual,fortune,idi,hpda}!dmsd!bass (408) 996-0557