Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: BITNET mail follows
Message-ID: <686@uw-beaver>
Date: Thu, 31-Jan-85 20:14:43 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.686
Posted: Thu Jan 31 20:14:43 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 11:14:32 EST
Sender: daemon@uw-beaver
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 46

From: <DAVEG%SLACVM.BITNET@Lindy>

Date: 30 January 85 09:03-PST
From: DAVEG@SLACVM
To: INFO-MAC@SUMEX-AIM
Subject: BITNET mail follows

Date: 30 January 1985, 09:02:10 PST
From: DAVEG    at SLACVM
To:   INFO-MAC at SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD
Subject: 150 ns chips

I am using 150ns chips in my Mac with no problems so far.  Evidently
the only disadvantage is heat dissipation.  David Gelphman  DAVEG@SLACVM.BITNET
Return-Path: <DAVEG%SLACVM.BITNET@Lindy>
Received: from Lindy by SUMEX-AIM.ARPA with TCP; Wed 30 Jan 85 09:29:36-PST
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 85 09:28:19 PST
From: <DAVEG%SLACVM.BITNET@Lindy>
To: INFO-MAC@SUMEX-AIM
Subject:  BITNET mail follows

Date: 30 January 85 09:26-PST
From: DAVEG@SLACVM
To: INFO-MAC@SUMEX-AIM
Subject: BITNET mail follows

Date: 30 January 1985, 09:20:15 PST
From: DAVEG    at SLACVM
To:   INFO-MAC at SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD
Subject: Megamax C

I just called Megamax in Richardson Texas and got part of the scoop on
availability of their C compiler.  The update discussed earlier on
INFO-MAC will be available in about a week.  It will be free to those
who alreay have the earlier version.  Sending in the original disk (after
backing it up) will get you the new version free of charge.  They also
claim to send more documentation.
   I asked whether Stanford will get the consortium price ($165).  They
said Stanford has expressed interested (IRIS) but nothing has happened yet.
Megamax quoted me a $220 price (educational discount) over the phone so
even if you go through Stanford eventually, you will only save $30 since
there will be a handling fee.  Maybe it is not worth it after all.
   I also found out that at CMU there was a mistake and about 15 people
bought an earlier version for $90 before the mistake is discovered.  I
had heard about a $90 price there but it turned out to be a mistake.
  David Gelphman   DAVEG@SLACVM.BITNET