Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac From: info-mac@uw-beaver Newsgroups: fa.info-mac Subject: MacPascals? Message-ID: <690@uw-beaver> Date: Thu, 31-Jan-85 20:27:16 EST Article-I.D.: uw-beave.690 Posted: Thu Jan 31 20:27:16 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 11:16:16 EST Sender: daemon@uw-beaver Organization: U of Washington Computer Science Lines: 20 From: John Gilbert CD I am marketing a commercial package written in TurboPascal. I would like to offer it to the Mac marketplace and had planned to do so based on the persistent rumors that Borland was going to make a Mac version of their system. Recent rumors; however, indicate that this may not be the case. I understand that there are two versions of Pascal available for the MAC, and I would like to develop a fall back position using one of them. It is my understanding that both of these Pascal's use P-code which means that I might be limited to the submarket of Mac owner's who have Pascal. This is clearly not a desirable situation. Can someone tell me if the license agreement for either of the existing Pascal provides (even for a fee) the right to include P-code as part of a commercial package written in that version of Pascal? John "Indecision is better than no decision at all."