Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!laser-lovers
From: laser-lovers@uw-beaver
Newsgroups: fa.laser-lovers
Subject: Re:  PostScript vs. Interpress
Message-ID: <714@uw-beaver>
Date: Fri, 1-Feb-85 18:15:59 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.714
Posted: Fri Feb  1 18:15:59 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 3-Feb-85 09:02:35 EST
Sender: daemon@uw-beaver
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 20

From: dave@wisc-rsch.arpa (Dave Cohrs)


Rob Warnock asks:

> 4. [Speculation:] Does Xerox actually USE Interpress in any products yet, or
>    do they still use some version of the "Empress" format (not to be confused
>    with Imagen's "Impress"... or is it?)? ...and if Interpress is not real yet,
>    is it likely to be supplanted by PostScript within Xerox?

Xerox uses Interpress in some of their workstation applications  (I don't
know specifics -- I haven't gotten my login on them yet...).  I might
add that they also use Empress and can print both formats.

----
(Bug?  What bug?  That's a feature!)

Dave Cohrs
...!{allegra,heurikon,ihnp4,seismo,uwm-evax}!uwvax!dave
dave@wisc-rsch.arpa